26 February 2009

Intellectuals, "the real America" and the GOP

I'd like to examine the state of the Republican Party in February 2009, with a particular focus on two individuals who recently have been deified by "the base," and evaluate exactly what that says about the GOP as a whole.

Joe Wurzelbacher, better known as "Joe the Plumber," appeared today as a panelist at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington. The topic? New media strategies to shape the future of conservatism. In case you discount CPAC as some sort of fringe convention, President Bush and Vice-President Cheney were the guests of honor last year.

Wurzelbacher was literally an overnight sensation, as he confronted Barack Obama in a rope line at an October campaign event, and asked Obama about the tax burden levied by his platform. Wurzelbacher's question elicited Obama's infamous "spread the wealth around remark," which lit a spark under the McCain campaign and raised eyebrows about the Changemaker's view of the role of government.

McCain's team gleefully invoked Wurzelbacher's name hundreds of times over the next few weeks, attempting (with a moderate deal of success) to paint Obama as a typical redistributionist liberal. "Joe the Plumber" was a campaign message -- a metaphor for middle class Americans -- used to reflected the Hopemonger's subscription to many of the same failed economic policies that have driven western Europe into a perpetual recession.

Wurzelbacher's 15 minutes should have been up weeks before the election. Instead, subsequent to his encounter with Obama, he appeared on the CBS Evening News, Good Morning America, three shows on FOX News and multiple campaign rallies alongside McCain and Sarah Palin. 

Wurzelbacher has now inked a book deal. "Joe the Plumber -- Fighting for the American Dream" already has been sent to a number of media outlets for advance release. In January, Pajamas Media, a conglomeration of high-profile conservative blogs, made Wurzelbacher a foreign war correspondent, in which he reported directly from Israel. And as noted above, Wurzelbacher today appeared at CPAC.

The second individual for consideration is Gov. Palin herself.

Putting aside Palin's political predilections for the moment -- and even your personal opinions about her performance during the campaign -- what is it about Palin that so galvanizes the base?

The late William Buckley -- the undisputed godfather of modern conservatism -- hired a young David Brooks at the National Review the mid-1980s, and as Buckley entered the twilight of his life, the two men developed a close relationship. Brooks had this to say about the great man:

"His entire life was a celebration of urbane values, sophistication, and the rigorous and constant application of intellect. Driven by a need to engage elite opinion, conservatives tried to build an intellectual counterestablishment with think tanks and magazines. They disdained the ideas of the liberal professoriate, but they did not disdain the idea of a cultivated mind."

In October, Sarah Palin referred to small town in Virginia as "the real America" and one of the "pro-America areas of this great nation." It was a remarkable statement. And it was blatant, shameless, ignorant pandering.

I am friends with many Democrats. And any suggestion that these people -- or left-of-center politicians such as Bob Casey, Jim Webb or Joe Biden -- love their country any less than small-town Americans is outrageous.

It's stupid.

And it's either demagoguery, or it's staggering ignorance.

Sarah Palin asks her supporters to believe that there are two kinds of Americans: wholesome, hard-working Americans from the heartland; and secular, overeducated intellectuals on the coasts. I agree with Brooks' assessment that Palin's attitude evinces the fact that Republicans' disdain for stuffy, intellectual elites like Michael Dukakis and John Kerry has inexplicably grown into a disdain for intellectuals generally.

Sarah Palin shamelessly reverses the same cultural and class warfare of the media elites that she so derides. This kind of cultural warfare is no better than the "cultural condescension" peddled by the likes of Kerry, Krugman, Dowd, et al. that is so pervasive in modern liberalism. 

If you think otherwise, it's time to put down the kool-aid.

In 1984, Ronald Reagan won every state in the union but Walter Mondale's home state of Minnesota. This means that Reagan took California, Oregon, Illinois and the entire northeast. What he built was a conservative movement rooted in salt-of-the-earth ideals that resonated from coast to coast.

Somewhere between Reagan's staggering 49-state take in 1984 and Sarah Palin's acidic October remarks, the Republican Party has managed to isolate virtually every educated swath of the electorate and intellectual area of the country. 

We discussed this several weeks ago regarding Rush Limbaugh's staggering influence in the conservative movement and the utter lack of a marketplace of ideas in Republican circles. After an enormous electoral trouncing, how can the party better itself if intellectuals with sophisticated ideas not only aren't given a voice, but are scorned?

And how can it continue to sustain the poisonous cultural-warfare message belted out by Palin, et al.? What type of undecided voter is attracted to such an idea?

As long as moderate voters see the likes of Limbaugh, Palin and Wurzelbacher as conservatism's faces and opinion-makers, the Republican Party will continue to languish in the wilderness.

For now, this is a party that is so far off of the tracks that it's beyond laughable. 

UPDATE: Friday, February 27, 2009 at 1:05 p.m.: Yesterday, the affable Mr. Wurzelbacher made the following remarks:

"Back in the day, really, when people would talk about our military in a poor way, somebody would shoot 'em. And there'd be nothing said about that, because they knew it was wrong."

Un. Freaking. Believable.

This, kids, is called fascism. 

Once again, the level of sheer, unadulterated ignorance is beyond staggering.

Hat tip: Donklephant.


Courtney said...


As a political blogger, I thought you would be interested in new information about a nominee for President Obama's economic stimulus package advisory panel.

Obama promised to establish a stimulus review board to oversee the bailout money. One part of this board is an independent advisory panel that will involve individuals from the private sector, outside of the government. Obama said the purpose of a panel of outside experts to watch over the stimulus spending is to ensure that it gets input from beyond the nation's capital.
With this taken into consideration, Logicalis, a multi-billion dollar information technology solutions and strategy company, is announcing that it is nominating CFO, Greg Baker, for a seat on this advisory panel. Logicalis feels that the combination of Baker’s experience and the nature of the services that Logicalis provides makes him an excellent candidate for a seat on the stimulus review board.

Check out the full article here http://www.us.logicalis.com/press_02-24-09.htm. But, more importantly, sign the petition to support Greg Baker at http://www.us.logicalis.com/obama/.
If you have any questions, or would be interested in a phone interview with Greg, please don't hesitate to contact me.

Looking forward to hearing from you,

Courtney Cooper
(937) 243-4822

Fan in Rain #5 said...

El Rushbo 1, Steele 0 and looking stupid to boot. But that said, Steele was right! Rushbo is nothing but a two bit ugly entertainer. (and I don’t mean physically ugly) I agree with El Rushbo much of the time, but the manner in which he presents himself and the GOP is deplorable. El Rushbo does the GOP no good as an apparent "party leader".

Further, nothing demonstrates better how little conviction and actual leadership ability El Rushbo actually possess than his response to Steele - El Rusho responds he isn't the party leader, and if he were, he would quit because of the current state of the GOP. News Flash Rushbo - you are, probably only second to George W., the most prominent face associated with the GOP. Ergo, while you were never president, as a defacto conservative party leader for decades, you are to a large degree responsible for the current state of the GOP.

If Rushbo was anything more than a two bit entertainer, he would not have pounced on the opportunity to embarrass the new GOP RNC leader and would have either remained silent or eaten crow for the sake of the greater good (i.e. the conservative agenda). El Rushbo, you remind me of democrats two busy feuding over meaningless details and putting their own narrow minded agenda's before their political party's cause that they failed to run a coherent campaign. God save us all if the GOP is heading for mindless political infighting, previously the hallmark of democrats. El Rushbo better get on the GOP band wagon or you can bet that he (and the GOP) are soon to be breathing their last breathes beneath the hemp sewn sandals of the BO-Bot army.

Anonymous said...

I have no interest in defending Joe the Plumber or Palin, but the Republican party hasn't alienated the American people since Reagan, the sad fact is that America has become more liberal. The Republicans are at fault to the extent that they are more liberal than Reagan also and in trying to play to the middle they cut their own legs off whilst adding credibility to the left.

Jonathan Bert said...

Great Blog! I'm going to link to you, moderates are going to have to hang together or for sure we will hang separately.

The Right, very obviously, scorns intelligent thought, and the Left just doesn't seem to have any.

Thank you.

commoncents said...

Interesting stuff!

Would you like a Link Exchange with our blog COMMON CENTS where we blog about the issues of the day??


Fan in Rain #6 said...

"Why, one wonders, not "save" $5 trillion by proposing to spend that amount to cover the moon with yogurt, and then canceling the proposal?"

-George Will, RCP

Del Patterson said...

If Sarah Palin had a brain, I swear she would fly backwards.

Oops, sorry, I forgot, she's already backwards.